The Examination Process

Forensic Handwriting & Document Examination

Questioned document examination involves the systematic comparison and evaluation of handwriting, signatures, and document features to determine what the evidence supports.

The quality of the material submitted for examination is important. Appropriate questioned documents, known comparison material, and clear reproductions or original documents can significantly affect what conclusions may be reached.

What Is Needed for Comparison

Questioned Material & Known Material

A handwriting or signature examination generally requires two categories of material: the item being questioned and genuine comparison material from the person whose writing is at issue.

Questioned Material

The writing or document in dispute

Questioned material is the signature, handwriting, entry, or document feature that requires examination. These items are commonly designated with the letter Q during an examination.

Examples include disputed signatures, handwritten notes, altered entries, anonymous writing, and other questioned document evidence.
Known Material

Genuine writing used for comparison

Known material consists of genuine handwriting or signatures from the person whose writing is being evaluated. These items are commonly designated with the letter K during an examination.

Useful known material may include records, checks, applications, correspondence, forms, or other naturally written documents created around the relevant time period.
Better Material, Better Comparison

What Makes Good Known Writing?

The usefulness of known handwriting depends on more than simply having a genuine signature or writing sample. Good comparison material should provide a meaningful range of the writer's natural habits.

Quantity Matters

Several genuine examples are generally more useful than a single signature or writing sample because natural variation can only be evaluated when enough material is available.

Similar Time Period

Known writing produced reasonably close in time to the questioned material is usually preferable, particularly when age, health, writing habits, or circumstances may have changed over time.

Comparable Writing

Known material should contain writing that is reasonably comparable to the questioned material. Signature questions are best compared with genuine signatures, while extended handwriting requires suitable handwriting exemplars.

Naturally Written Documents

Writing produced during the normal course of business or everyday activity can be especially useful because it was generally created without the writer attempting to control or alter normal writing habits.

Do not discard material simply because you are unsure whether it is useful. It is often better to provide the available documents and allow the examiner to determine which items are suitable for comparison.
Document Quality Matters

Originals vs. Copies

Some examinations can be conducted from high-quality copies, while others may require inspection of the original document. The type of question being asked determines how important the original document may be.

Copies May Be Sufficient

Clear, high-resolution scans or photographs may permit handwriting or signature comparison when the relevant writing features are reproduced with sufficient detail.

Originals Provide More Information

Original documents may preserve features that copies cannot, including pressure, ink characteristics, writing sequence, indentations, erasures, alterations, and other physical evidence.

Some Examinations Require Originals

Questions involving document alteration, indented writing, obliterations, writing sequence, or other physical document features may not be fully answerable from a reproduction.

If only copies are currently available, they may still be worth reviewing. The examiner can determine whether the available reproduction is suitable for the requested examination and whether the original should be obtained.
The Examination Process

How a Handwriting Examination Is Conducted

When possible and practical, the known writing is examined before the questioned material. This allows the examiner to become familiar with the writer's normal habits and natural range of variation before evaluating the writing in dispute.

1

Study the Known Writing

Genuine writing is examined to identify recurring habits, natural variation, and individual characteristics that normally appear in the writer's handwriting or signatures.

2

Examine the Questioned Material

After becoming familiar with the known writer's habits, the questioned writing is examined for the characteristics available for comparison.

3

Compare Significant Features

The writings are compared for features such as line quality, construction, proportions, slant, spacing, connections, rhythm, and other individual writing characteristics.

4

Evaluate Similarities & Differences

Observed similarities and differences are evaluated for significance, including whether differences fall within the writer's natural variation or can be explained by writing conditions.

5

Form an Opinion

The findings are evaluated as a whole and an opinion is reached based on the quality, quantity, and significance of the available evidence.

Have a Document to Examine?

Start with a free initial consultation.

If you have a questioned signature, handwriting, or document issue, contact Meyer Questioned Document Examination to discuss the available material and whether a forensic examination may be appropriate.